Fate? Nah. Coincidence? Possibly. Hard work, determination and an
antipathy to business school? That's more like it. When
young Michael Shanks came down to Vancouver to pursue a business degree,
the first big-city celebrity he spotted was
Richard Dean Anderson, on location for an episode of MacGyver. Thirteen
years later, Shanks stars opposite Anderson in
Stargate SG-1 (Wednesdays, 8 p.m./ET, Showtime), and business school is
a distant memory. When we talked with him, he
was spending his Stargate hiatus shooting an episode for Showtime's
Outer Limits. "I play -- surprise, surprise -- a scientist,"
he laughs. - Josh Walsh
Do you get recognized on the street by fans of the show?
Not much. I look completely different off set than I do on. Once I take
Daniel's glasses off I look very different. It's good
because it gives you a sense of anonymity. You can do anything else
after this and nobody knows who the hell you are. I have
one of those faces that really blends into a crowd well. It makes my
life very simple when I leave work. Christopher Judge,
who plays Teal'c, gets picked out of the crowd a fair bit.
You don't sound particularly envious.
He gets a lot of attention outside, and he handles it well. I don't
think I'm the same personality. I don't think I could deal with
it as well as he does.
How's the fan mail?
It's been good. What I find amazing about it is -- what I've been
getting so far, anyway -- it's very intellectual. I haven't been
getting any of that crazy, obsessive, underwear-in-the-mail kind of
stuff. It's all been very smart, written by people at least 25
or older, asking intelligent questions, and just saying that they really
enjoy the show. It's the kind of mail you feel like
responding to. You feel like letting them in, as opposed to, you know,
"Good God!"
Is it a little intimidating to know your fans are that smart?
Oh, yeah. The archaeology stuff is a real stretch for me, and people are
always asking me questions about it. Especially about
Egyptian mythology. And I've done a little bit of homework on that, but
I could not possibly answer the in-depth questions
that are being posed to me. It does get a little bit much because you
always want to sound like you know what you're talking
about, but you don't, so you'd better just be honest about it. It's
easier just to break the facade right away and say, "Hey, I
don't know what the hell I'm talking about most of the time."
Do you go on the Internet for the fan reaction there?
I haven't gotten my computer hooked up, but every now and again my
friends show me what's out there, and they look at
some of the stuff about the show. I know there are a lot of sites out
there. And when you consider that we're only reaching 20
percent of the American market, I think we're doing pretty well.
Science-fiction fans are pretty dedicated. What's been nice
about the Internet response is that we haven't been treated very nicely
sometimes in the press, and it's good to see that the
audience doesn't give a crap and they're still big fans of the show.
They give us their feedback, too, which is wonderful,
because they don't pull any punches. They say what they want to say. If
they didn't like it, they didn't like it. But it's great
to have that immediate reaction right after a show airs. I know the
producers here go on there secretly and see what people
have to say as soon as the show airs.
Are you a sci-fi fan yourself?
I was when I was a kid. Like most kids my age, when Star Wars came out I
thought that was just the be-all and end-all. Sci-fi
was really starting to find its legs then. I loved the old Star Trek
series, and then things like Space: 1999 and Battlestar
Galactica. And when you're a kid, that catches your attention because
it's so different and so thought-provoking. The
imagination just runs wild with it, and you want to get all the toys and
play. But as I got older, I found -- especially with the
new Star Trek series -- that they had become almost like soap operas; if
you missed a week, you wouldn't know what the hell
was going on.
What got you into acting?
I think as a kid I had a very active imagination. And things like movies
and television were always unique to me in taking me
out of everyday life. I grew up in a very small town, called Kamloops in
British Columbia. It sounds like a cereal, I know. I
don't think the name means anything. Or if it does, I never learned it.
I started doing stuff at a very young age -- stage plays and whatnot. A
teacher of mine in junior high school always nagged me
to stay with it. In a good way, of course. She just kept poking at me,
wondering why the hell I wasn't pursuing it. But there
wasn't any opportunity to pursue it, not where I grew up. We had, I
think, one professional theater, and no film industry.
And I was 18 or 19 by the time I left there. I went to university in
Vancouver, planning for a degree in business.
Yikes.
I know. I still look back at that with a smile on my face. But it turned
out that I didn't have the credits necessary for business
school that term anyway, so I just took a general year of arts. I found
myself doing more plays than anything else, and the
following year I switched into the theater program full-time.
What's next? Are you looking at features, or are you happy working in
television?
I think most actors want eventually to move into features and to do work
with a lot of substance and work with some really
talented people. And hopefully to have stories told -- hopefully, of
course, being the key word -- the way that they should be
told because you have the time and the money to do it. So, yes, I hope
that Stargate leads into something in those lines. As
good as I know this show is, you just can't linger over every detail on
a schedule like ours. You finally come to a point where,
even if something's not right, you have to say, "That's good enough, and
we'll fix it in the editing room." And boy, that hurts
when you hear that. Because you want so much to get it, to bring it to
that level. Working in television can have its moments,
when it's absolutely right and working well, but for the most part it's
a factory. And it has deadlines and it must meet those
deadlines, and art is not really that key to it because it gets spiced
up by all the other elements. So it can be a bit frustrating for
an actor, but once you see your paycheck you sort of get over it.
And I have to admit that there are times on this set when there's no
place I'd rather be. There are moments when you'd be
hard-pressed to find a better opportunity. It just feels right, and it's
working, and it's very gratifying.
Thrown together on a location for months at a time, a cast like
Stargate's can either bond really well or try to kill each other.
Which has it been?
You know something, I have been nothing but pleasantly surprised by this
group. This is an amazing group of people to work
with. They're excited and inspired, and they all want this show to fly.
They're committed to making it credible and worthy and
dramatic and gut-wrenching and all those things. They want it to happen.
And everybody here is a lot of fun to work with.
Everybody wants to have a good time. I've been nothing but happy. I
haven't had one qualm with any of the people that I've
worked with here.
TV Guide Entertainment Network Presents Sci-Fi/Fantasy Q&A
By: Josh Walsh
February 18th, 1998