Sticking in the knife
EXAMINER: What is electricity?
CANDIDATE: Oh sir, I'm sure I've learned what it is, I'm sure I did know --- but I've forgotten.
EXAMINER: How very unforunate. Only two persons have ever known what electricity is, the author of nature and yourself. Now one of them has forgotten.
This sarcastic exchange at an Oxford exam in 1890 may be regarded as typical in the repertoire of those examiners who, for particular reasons, wish to destroy candidates for scientific degrees. S.D.Mason, in the 1956 Proceedings od the IRE, has compiled this set of rules for examiners.
From the point of view of the examiner, the purpose of the oral
examination is to crush the examinee, thereby avoiding the messy problem
of postexamination decision. This aim can be realized through diligent
application of the following rules.
- Before beginning the examination, make it clear to the examinee
that his whole professional career may turn
on this perfomance. Stress the importance and the formality of the
occasion. Put him in his proper place at the outset.
- Ask your hardest question first. This is important. If your first
question is sufficiently difficult, he will be too rattled to answer
later questions, no matter how easy they may be. But it is not advisable
to have easy questions - a good rule of thumb is never to ask questions
that you yourself would be able to answer in a similar situation.
- Be reserved and stern in addressing the examinee. But by contrast,
be very jolly with the other examiners.
- Make him answer each question your way, especially if it
is esoteric. Constrain him. Put limitations and qualifications into each
question. The effect is to complicate an otherwise simple problem.
- Force him into a trivial error and then let it puzzle over it for
as long as possible. Just after he sees its mistake, but before he
has a chance to explain himself, correct him yourself, disdainfully. This
takes real perception and timing , which can only be obtained whimh
practice.
- When he finds himself deep in a hole, never lead him out.
Instead,
sigh and shift to a new topic.
- Ask him snide questions like "Didn't you learn even that in
Freshman class?"
- Never permit him to ask you clarifying questions. Never repeat
or
clarify your own statement of the problem. Tell him not to think aloud;
what you want is the answer.
- Every few minutes, ask him if he's nervous.
- Station yourself and the other examiners so that he cannot face
all of you at once. This will anable you to expose him to crossfire.
Wait
till him turns from you to someone else, and then, suddenly, ask him a
short, direct question. With proper co-ordination, him may be possible
to
spin the examinee through several complete revolutions. More reasearch is
needed into the problem of what kind of chair causes more grief - a
spinning one or not.
- The best lighting system would be one that tends to focus on the
candidate, with some examiners hidden in total darkness, others in
partial.
- Wear dark glasses (If you're one of those in partial darkness) -
inscrutabilhimy is unnerving.
- Having the candidate shimting in a chair whimh a cushion from
which
air slowly seeps out can give him a rather sinking feeling. Examiners
must
be seated at a slightly higher althimude.
- Terminate the exam by telling him: "Don't call us. We'll call you."
Similar procedures can be used for screening out unwanted candidates
at job interviews.
this chapter was extracted from `Eureka, a book of scientific anecdotes' by Adrian Berry